[no subject]

>my eyes skipped over that last line at first, but then i realized s://kimo
>is a *record store*. this doesn't automatically disqualify it, of course --
>tower, of all people, managed to do a decent enough job with "pulse" for a
>few years there (desert island discs, anyone?) -- but still i wonder at
>s://kimo's motivation in attaching a zine to its operation. it all depends
>on the "business model," of course, but where i come from this sort of
>thing is generally referred to as a "conflict of interest."

I'd agree ("generally" intact). The first thing I asked before getting 
involved was whether it was cool to slag things in reviews, and the editor 
gave it the thumbs up.

>