Re: [microsound] extensive use of" dsp and non-realtime manipulation was:Re: [microsound]: What is microsound ? [was: autechre/richard

[Greg <gregg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> or the recording "drone hill" (I cant remember the maker right now
> for'edexsp'er can help you out) the entire CD is excerpts from recordings
> made with contact mics under high voltage wires. (BTW I tried it and I
> didn't get the same results).
>
> or Philip jeck (real-time and hardly extensive and hardly digital (BTW
> "vinyl coda 1,2,3" is wonderful)
> or that schafer man (the quad needle turntable man).
>
> sorry for the lack of flushed out references. . .

I agree. The end sound/result is what distinguishes a work as microsound.
Not the methods used to gain these results. computers are not a
pre-requisite for microsound.

I guess this actually differs from the original terms used by Sean and Kim
at microsound.org a bit. dsp is a possible working method, but not by a long
way, the only one.