|-| minor . tirds :: Re: [microsound] Performing "Live"

[sjb <sjb@xxxxxx>]

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jason urick" <themoonstealingproject@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > you are trying to accomplish with this argument or
> > even what you are trying to accomplish on this list.
> > to devaluate "microsound"?

hmmm. #1 paranoid . insecure . ineffective / non progressive statement.
 
> jonah =
> but compared to mehldau .....
>
> jason = 
> > you come across much like a
> > jazz die-hard trying to come to grips with punk rock
> > in the 70's or a rock die-hard trying to understand
> > the point of hip-hop in the 80's.

all right nuggo : i think now is a good time to graduate from 9th grade.

since we have o.d'd on semantics here :: your argument is about as ineffective as HCl is to chocolate.

you are convincing yourself of why you think you can relate to other people who you think feel the same as you
do about some martyrian mindset in lieu of microsound's insipid unfamiliarity with anything remotely accepted
by a large percentage of your populous which you deem as hopelessly ignorant anyhow -- yet for some reason
still try to convince -- of microsound's worthiness in scientific structure or perhaps ethical evolution yet
end up continuously frustrated and thus having to cling to a cult archetype which in turn forces you to
fly-swat any hint of consciousness-entering verbiage that questions the form AND functionality of your
frightened prescription >> regardless of its worthwhile (to you) message of logical, progressive, intelligent,
skillful representation in sonic performance.

jonah, you shouldn't be so conceptually forgiving to these people.

..s