[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microsound] death of internet radio......fight back!! now



From: Tad Turner <tad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This is what I find to be a bit illusory about "alternative" or
"independent" phenomenon: they don't really participate in an
alternative economy. An artist's dilemma is to either go with the ways
big business has established to make money, or put up with giving things
away free, or trying to construct some moral postion around it.

What kind of alternative economy are you expecting? Giving away things for free seems to me to be an alternative TO the economy. Don't you think that webcasters (or at least let's say non-commercial webcasters) should be able to broadcast music for free? Or do you agree with the CARP in principal but only have a problem with the numbers?


(Before anyone gets too hot, I should say that this is systematic.
Capitalism incorporates economic alternatives as "minor features." If it
were possible to grow truly alternative economies, Capitalism would've
been done in long ago. Anyway, it's not something under the control of
artists and other alternative types.)

So are you saying that there is no real difference between a small label and a large corporation because the small label doesn't function under a fundamentally different economic model?
I'm asking these questions not in a confrontational way but because I'm genuinely interested in understanding what you're saying.



_________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com