Re: [microsound] influence vs. replica

[Karl Moskvitch <moskvitch@xxxxxxx>]

And in any case, why worry so much about the question of "new" or not?

It is valid to discuss it, progress is o.k. But not if the quality (of a
piece of music) suffers. But it becomes a problem if you invert it, dismiss
a piece of music only because it use an old process or whatever ...




----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Roberts" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Microsound" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [microsound] influence vs. replica


>
> In which case, there is truly nothing new under the sun...
>
>
>
> on 24/10/02 12:21, scissors for sparrow at transmit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >
> >> Isn't that one of the cornerstones of post-modernism?
> >
> > yeah, but whether you buy that theory wholesale is another thing
> > altogether!  many have disavowed all affinities to it already.
> >
> > in any case, i think more sophisticated post-modernist critiques would
> > allow that post-modernism is by no means a new process of artistic and
> > cultural production, but rather has been a mode of production that has
gone
> > by unacknowledged in previous eras.
> >
> > food for munch,
> > jon.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://home.pacific.net.au/~transmit
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > website: http://www.microsound.org
> >
>
> --
> http://www.valotalo.com
>
> Korvanranta 56 A 4
> 96300 Rovaniemi
> Finland
>
> tel: +358 (016) 310080
> mob: +358 (040) 7580433
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>