Re: [microsound] glitch and/as neo-modermism?

["ph!L @ c e n t i b e l" <hellomynameisphil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

------=_NextPart_000_1660_01C2A44C.A36AA420
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>Hi, Phil. I'm hoping other folks will join in, or maybe we should take
this 
>conversation offline? 

Well, due to popular demand (OK, two people), I think we should
continue. I don't have too much to say to your points, since I'm mostly
in agreement with what you say. But here is where I would like to
explicitly open the discussion to others, as well as invite your
comments. Do you think glitch is mobilizing Manovich's neo-modernism,
perhaps even without realizing it? I'm still mulling over Ian's
contention that glitch is a kind of neo-modernism and/or return to a
pure art. In some ways that may be true, and yet I'm not entirely
convinced, or perhaps just not entirely convinced that it's nec a bad
thing. 

ph

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Phil Thomson

http://www3.telus.net/thisisphil/
http://centibel.vze.com/
http://everything.does.it/
http://www.sfu.ca/~pthomson/

speaker/interlocutor (xenophony media, canada)
scan (s'agita, italy)
synat (acidfake, macedonia)
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 

_______________________________________________________________
Get the FREE email that has everyone talking at
http://www.mail2world.com

------=_NextPart_000_1660_01C2A44C.A36AA420--

------------------------------