Re: [microsound] lack of archival information

["The pHarmanaut" <pharmanaut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

otherwise, it seems like it would entail a shift of formats into a bulletin
board (ubb makes a good free one) or a blog. The blog may well be too
chaotic with as many participants as we have, but it could be a good way to
maintain a quick-and-dirty FAQ. But who wants to maintain it? In both cases,
and in my experience, both forms are less spontaneous than an email list,
but they also tend to amplify the quality signal over redundant noise.

-=trace

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Kugel" <guitardo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "microsound" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [microsound] lack of archival information

> The task is beyond my understanding, but an archival system like the ones
I've
> seen elsewhere, sortable by name, date, thread etc. would be great
(probably
> costly too...)
>
> ex: http://roland.code404.com/pipermail/a6/
>
> tim
>
> Kim Cascone wrote:
>
> > to keep the same basic observations from occurring over and over but if
> > anyone has suggestions it would be good to hear them...
> > also, I'm not sure if this list can be set up to automatically archive
but I
> > will look into that...
> > KIM
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>

------------------------------