[no subject]

>well, i am under the impression that, the more merzbow the better.  but 
>seriously, 'day of seals' is an excellent album.  it is very distortion 
>heavy & "noisy", but not all over the place like 'a taste of...' & not as 
>rythmic as 'amlux'.  i consider 'amlux' to be my personal favorite merzbow 
>release of 2002, but a friend of mine who works at a record store posted 
>'day of seals' as one of his top ten.  i asked him, "is 'day of seals'
better than 'amlux' just because it's more merzbow, or is it >consitently a
better album in yr opinion?"  the conclusion was that 'amlux' is a more
>consistent release, but a lot of that has to do with the single disc 
>format. because 'day of seals' was released over four discs, the quantity 
>of
quality merzbow is just greater.  there are tracks of 'day of seals' >that
could be considered weaker than others, & even weaker than on other >merzbow
releases in 2002.  but the sheer amount of quality merzbow tracks >on 'day 
of
seals' is enough to make it a worthwhile investment.  so, 'amlux' is >still
my personal favorite release for 2002, but 'day of seals' is definately
>worth it in my opinion in the sense that it is more quality merzbow for yr 
>money.

>love
toni000
>twingles.com/transmission/flashram

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

------------------------------