Re: [microsound] [ot] the 56k challenge

[Scott Carver <fscthaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I imagine there might be some territory to be covered by taking the  
lead of Cardew (by way of Treatise), and creating a 56k file with no  
explicit decoding procedure at all.

- Scott

On Jan 23, 2005, at 8:37 PM, Aaron Ximm wrote:

> > this. It seems to me there are any number of ways a sound (a sonic
> > experience?) could be transmitted in a 56k file... I don't think the
>
> MIDI files are arguably at least as portable as MP3s.
>
> And that's a lot of tablature in plaintext...
>
>  fast
>
>   
> ----(2)-0-----------(5)-0-------------(2)-0----------(3)(2) 
> -0----------
>   
> ------------(3)-5------------(3)-5-----------(3)-5-------------(3) 
> -5---
>  --...
>  --...
>  --...
> --...
>
>  :D
>
>   aaron
>
>   ghede@xxxxxxxx
>   http://www.quietamerican.org
>
>   |  quod omne animal post   |
>   |  cogitum est triste...   |
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org