[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] emu e64 vs e6400
- To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [microsound] emu e64 vs e6400
- From: guiver ben <benreviug@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 01:20:57 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
alright nick,
i have e64. old but ok. operating system 3 but try and
get newer one like 4. depends on what you want to do.
i run e64 into mac g3, recycle a bit unreliable but
peak fine to import/export samples.
depends what you want to do. e6400 prob has better
memory, larger hard drive etc etc.
you might wnat to think about a newer sampler thats
easier to use with pc/mac: some yamaha's have usb
connection i think, so therefore easier to access hard
drive.
i'd be interested to see what other people say tho',
as in some ways i've only scratched the surface of
mine.
best
ben
--- Nick S <hasnoplur@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi all...new to the list...anyways, quick question
> for the emu heads here....what are the main
> differences between the e64 and e6400 samplers?
>
> ive been looking to get an emu for awhile, and now,
> it seems the price is finally right for me.
>
>
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun.
http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org