Re: [microsound] Derivative Music

["mat.the.w" <craque@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I will be the first to admit love for Paul D Miller, but am completely
confused by the presense of his own line of musical history, shared with
RZA?

On 2/23/06 3:41 AM, "Terence Caulkins" <Terence.Caulkins@xxxxxxxx> scribed:

> Hello everyone, 
> 
> On the subject of musical derivatives the following diagram of
> the London Underground is interesting (hopefully no one has posted
> it yet) :
> http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2006/02/02/undergroun
> d5.pdf
> 
> The following article talks about the making of the diagram :
> http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/culturevulture/archives/2006/02/03/going_undergrou
> nd.html
> 
> -Terence
> 
> 
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:21:34 +0100
> To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: Risonanza Magnetica - S <s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [microsound] Derivative Music
> Message-Id: <D085C0E2-FAD8-42CD-B33E-C48BB269917E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi everybody,
> 
> I'd like to suggest you what do you think about the concept of =20
> "derivative music".
> I'm considering this in the field of post-punk, specifically referred =20=
> 
> to the the post-punk scene in Sao Paulo, Brasil, during the eighties, =20=
> 
> as "derivative" of No Wave scene in New York.
> 
> This concept should be valid also for a bigger part of electronic =20
> music field, i'd like to know if someone knows about a specific study =20=
> 
> on this=85
> 
> Thanks,
> Simone B
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org