Re: [microsound] m-audio microtrack or?

[Rob Danielson <type@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

For robust sounds like voice, music and loud 
effects (like the transom, radio perspective) and 
if one has phantom mics, its hard to beat a 
Microtrack for price and features.  For quiet 
locations and ambience where high gain and a low 
noise pre plays large role, the below test I did 
suggests one would might do better with HiMD. The 
MT's 1/8" mic in has even lower low sensitivity, 
I didn't include this input in the test. Rob D.
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/Mic%20Preamps/MicroTrack_NH900_722Compare2.mov

  = = ==

At 12:02 AM +0100 2/9/06, Björn Eriksson wrote:
>There is a review and article on this machine over at
>www.transom.org   Looks fine to me, but I have 
>not had the opportunity to test it yet.
>
>/Björn
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "p jørgensen" <p@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "microsound" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 8:50 PM
>Subject: [microsound] m-audio microtrack or?
>
>>Has anyone had any experience with m-audios microtrack recorder?
>>I'm looking for a recorder that's small 
>>(pocketsize would be perfect) and not to 
>>expensive and thought this might be ok.
>>Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>_//peter
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>website: http://www.microsound.org
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>website: http://www.microsound.org


-- 
Rob Danielson
Film Department
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee