RE: [microsound] Re: thom yorke's eraser (Burial)

[Noel Peters <npeters@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Fiar enough. I think the sketchy production is one of the things that draws me to it and I'm not one to necessarily embrace low-end for the sake of it. I also don't care who samples what. :)


-----Original Message-----
From: steinbrüchel [mailto:steinbruchel@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, 19 August 2006 12:40 AM
To: microsound
Subject: Re: [microsound] Re: thom yorke's eraser (Burial)

in my humble opinion the burial record is by far overrated.
sampling massive attack just is to easy...

for anyone freaking out because they think burial is ****ing good,
they should check out what scorn did 10 years ago. absolutely
stunning (and far heavier, deeper and better produced). and the
good thing about it is also that theirs no massive attack sampling
in near sight...

cheers, ralph.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org


_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed
Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information
visit http://www.mci.com

_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed
Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information
visit http://www.mci.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org