[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microsound] an interesting monolake answer

To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [microsound] an interesting monolake answer
From: craquemattic <craque@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:38:04 -0800

I'll have to agree with Mr. Henke here, visual representation of sound is ultimately a crutch.

I didn't read into this particular passage that he's talking at all about performance.

On Dec 18, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Graham Miller wrote:

any thoughts on this? agree? disagree?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org

References:
- [microsound] an interesting monolake answer
  - From: Graham Miller

Prev by Date: Re: [microsound] tonight in stockholm
Next by Date: Re: [microsound] an interesting monolake answer
Previous by thread: RE: [microsound] an interesting monolake answer
Next by thread: [microsound] NY
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread