Re: [microsound] renoise

[isjtar <list@xxxxxxxxxx>]

does anyone know of a tracker patch in max or pd?
i've always been intruiged, but would like to integrate in my workflow.
as i have no experience with trackers, i couldn't patch it myself.
best
isj

On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:45 PM, Cyrill Bloch wrote:

> I'm not sure of what I meant either!!! The fact is my music is now  
> far more ambient than before, but i still use the same tools,  
> sequencers, sound editors and so on. I don't play any sequence  
> anymore, but i use sequences to control effects, for example...
> I first thought a tracker was a very basic version of a sequencer,  
> but it seems i was wrong and that a sequencer has its own and  
> personal abilities, so i feel interested in it...
>
> C
>
> le 11/18/07 9:31 PM:
> > I'm not sure to what particular ambient type you make reference  
> > to. The most
> > "over-used" or classic type of change is the chiptune-like arp/ 
> > thrills where
> > you modify really fast the pitch of the sound so that although you  
> > are on a
> > monophonic channel, it feels like a chord. What you can control  
> > depends on
> > the tracker's engine and there again it depends on what you are  
> > using..;
> > think of it like a CC implementation for synth. Tracker used to  
> > run on very
> > limited hardware.. running usually 4 to 8 monophonic tracks and  
> > limited
> > memory so all kind of tricks where used to make feel like there  
> > was a lot
> > more :)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org