[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microsound] nin



I think only Karl Marx can answer that question. I only said to put
that aside cause it is a clusterfuck debate in and of itself.


--- Andrew Salch <asalch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 6 May 2008, Xdugef wrote:
> > 2.There is more inherent visual expression with physical packaging.
> >
> > Okay putting commodity fetishes aside is this really that
> important.
> 
> 
> If we put aside commodity fetishes, haven't we put aside even the
> music 
> itself, the audio component that we listen to? Or is there sometimes 
> something of music that remains even if we "put aside" commodity
> fetishes?
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org