Re: [microsound] MAX/MSP Algorithmic Generative Patch

[midinerd <midinerd@xxxxxxxxx>]

Why is everyone so snooty about this?  He just asked to share ideas.  I guess
they're too precious, right?  Sure.........

grahamwakefield wrote:
> 
> I think advice is being shared, as you were looking forward to.
> 
> Thought it would be fun to try googling your query:
> 
> http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=algorthmic 
> +generative+Max/MSP+patch&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
> 
> Lo, and the first result is:
> 
> "From: usrmanual ()
> Date: May 13, 2008
> Subject: MAX/MSP Algorithmic Generative Patch
> Hi Guys,
> looking forward to get some patch
> in this way or some advices too.
> 
> ;-) Regards"
> 
> There might be something self-referential about generative  
> algorithms... certainly anticipatory ones.
> 
> Regarding getting some patch in this way, hit no.3 is a well-known  
> starting point, or at least it offers a fruitful question:
> 
> http://www.essl.at/works/rtc.html
> 
> Further results in this google search are left as an exercise to the  
> inquiring mind.
> 
> For extra points, a recursive search on recursion:
> 
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=algorthmic 
> +generative+patch+Max%2FMSP+recursion&btnG=Search
> 
> hit 1: http://gparry.com/blog/
> 
> Hmm - looks like a like mind. Algorithmic composition, Max/MSP,  
> Generative music...
> 
> Perhaps too similar? OK, so feedback tends to information reduction,  
> maybe that can lose interest, maybe need to draw from some external  
> influence? Nice to see the Duchamp / Muybridge connection...
> 
> There's a whole world of wonder out there, if you want to play.
> 
> On May 13, 2008, at 8:25 PM, usrmanual wrote:
>> Up to u to understand my question, guys...
>> if you want to share or not...
>>
>>
>> 2008/5/13 Graham Miller <grahammiller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> i'm going to generate a patch to create a person to create a patch  
>>> for me
>>> that generates persons.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13-May-08, at 11:48 AM, craquemat wrote:
>>>
>>>  This confuses me a bit.
>>>>
>>>> Isn't the point of a programmed generative patch - max or not -  
>>>> to write
>>>> one on your own, so that it's your creation?
>>>>
>>>> usrmanual wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>> looking forward to get some patch
>>>>> in this way or some advices too.
>>>>> ;-) Regards
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> website: http://www.microsound.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> website: http://www.microsound.org
>>>
>>>
> 
> Be seeing you
> 
> grrr waaa
> www.grahamwakefield.net
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MAX-MSP-Algorithmic-Generative-Patch-tp17203609p17500365.html
Sent from the Microsound mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org