Re: [microsound] MAX/MSP Algorithmic Generative Patch

[usrmanual <usrmanual@xxxxxxxxx>]

Merci Graham and Gloire a *Marcel*....
------
--------
-
-------------------------------------------------

2008/5/14 Graham Wakefield <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> I think advice is being shared, as you were looking forward to.
>
> Thought it would be fun to try googling your query:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=algorthmic
> +generative+Max/MSP+patch&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
>
> Lo, and the first result is:
>
> "From: usrmanual ()
> Date: May 13, 2008
> Subject: MAX/MSP Algorithmic Generative Patch
> Hi Guys,
> looking forward to get some patch
> in this way or some advices too.
>
> ;-) Regards"
>
> There might be something self-referential about generative algorithms...
> certainly anticipatory ones.
>
> Regarding getting some patch in this way, hit no.3 is a well-known
> starting point, or at least it offers a fruitful question:
>
> http://www.essl.at/works/rtc.html
>
> Further results in this google search are left as an exercise to the
> inquiring mind.
>
> For extra points, a recursive search on recursion:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=algorthmic
> +generative+patch+Max%2FMSP+recursion&btnG=Search
>
> hit 1: http://gparry.com/blog/
>
> Hmm - looks like a like mind. Algorithmic composition, Max/MSP, Generative
> music...
>
> Perhaps too similar? OK, so feedback tends to information reduction, maybe
> that can lose interest, maybe need to draw from some external influence?
> Nice to see the Duchamp / Muybridge connection...
>
> There's a whole world of wonder out there, if you want to play.
>
>
> On May 13, 2008, at 8:25 PM, usrmanual wrote:
>
> > Up to u to understand my question, guys...
> > if you want to share or not...
> >
> >
> > 2008/5/13 Graham Miller <grahammiller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >  i'm going to generate a patch to create a person to create a patch for
> > > me
> > > that generates persons.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13-May-08, at 11:48 AM, craquemat wrote:
> > >
> > >  This confuses me a bit.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Isn't the point of a programmed generative patch - max or not - to
> > > > write
> > > > one on your own, so that it's your creation?
> > > >
> > > > usrmanual wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  Hi Guys,
> > > > > looking forward to get some patch
> > > > > in this way or some advices too.
> > > > > ;-) Regards
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > website: http://www.microsound.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > website: http://www.microsound.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> Be seeing you
>
> grrr waaa
> www.grahamwakefield.net
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>
>