[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] Graphic Scores
- To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ghostofjason@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [microsound] Graphic Scores
- From: Steven Ricks <stevericksmusic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:47:31 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Vd5HmEu9Xhj/21cxKQIwH1vYGrnoIH3z7FjE69cnh8Y=; b=D36Ca05FpOtDL934FpdZfmFE5ACsyXf+rgpr+cbHpkpdvW7RDis6jEyRRoxPi90BLe jTcjiBtWTeKrSO6ukhjtdoAux01m6RkM5yOHiwJ7xoqY2hKI6++q5Ws7NGjGJm6uAbeu MSbmil+6r09fYmoMf1m8o5ryu3JVJg1CuOSWc=
Stockhausen's Zyklus; Christian Wolff's Edges; Anthony Braxton has some
interesting mixes of traditional notation and graphic notation; not sure if
any of this applies . . .
Or if you're looking for more "traditionally" notated scores that have an
extreme visual impact you might check out some Brian Ferneyhough . . .
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:12 AM, jason <ghostofjason@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm currently carrying out research into graphic scores and synthesis. I
> was wondering if list members could highlight, in their opinion some of the
> most notable + interesting examples of this. I'm thinking along the lines of
> Earl Brown's abstract score for December 1952 and Stockhausen's score for
> Kontakte?
>
> interested to hear your responses.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Jess
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Not happy with your email address?.
> Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now
> at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>
>