Re: [microsound] mics >192khz

[flemming lyst <flemminglyst@xxxxxxxxx>]

oh, im very well aware of the concepts. i'm just having a hard time finding
the gear...
but i'll test my mics and see where they cut off...
thanks anyway...


-eske


On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Bruce Tovsky <bruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> mics, being analog devices, don't really have a "ceiling" per se regarding
> sample rate - what they do have is a frequency range, and the higher sample
> rates provide a greater ability to capture those frequencies. so, the better
> the mic the better your recording (using any sample rate) and the better the
> sample rate the better (subjectively) the recording - or, i should say, the
> better the capture of the frequencies the mic is delivering.
> make sense?
> best
> b
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2008, at 3:00 PM, flemming lyst wrote:
>
>  anyone got any tips on a mic that will record all the way up to 96khz?
>> as i'm able to record 192khz with my fireface i'm interested to hear
>> what's
>> going on up there...?
>>
>> any suggestions??
>>
>> i found some b&K on their website, but no prices...
>> www.bksv.com
>>
>> btw check out this fine article:
>> http://emusician.com/daw/emusic_going_wild/index.html
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>> eske
>>
>
> "A lot of people try to think up ideas. I'm not one. I'd rather accept the
> irresistible possibilities of what I can't ignore."
>
> - Robert Rauschenberg
>
>