reverb

[richard chartier <chartier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>any thoughts? why is "reverb" a bad word now? these dry, glitchy
>sounds that we all use rarely have any spacial effects added.. and
>the whole traditional art of production seems to have been thrown out
>the window!..


two artist who come to mind when i read this (off the top of my head)  are
Byetone and Senking ..using reverb.. their sounds can be rich but still
minimal. (and quite beautiful)

on the work "SPEC" that i did with taylor (hi taylor) we created tracks
that often mixed both worlds...
small crisp sounds and elements of small reverbs.... often giving the work
a more slight distant/glassy sound... which i ended up liking very much : )

hopefully artists won't set aesthetic limitations or stylistic trappings
on their work merely becuase their work belongs to a certain genre or
style...
: )

richard


r   i   c   h   a   r   d   c   h   a   r   t   i   e   r

..   painting   .   sound    .   design   .

chartier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.visionload.com/rchartier

FUTURE
"3particles" on lowercase compilation [bremsstrahlung, usa] 2CD, jan 2000
"un.entitled" CD, 2000

PRESENT
8 tracks on tool (various artists) [microwave, netherlands] 7"/CD
spec. (with taylor deupree) [12k, usa] CD
a hesitant fold [meme, japan]  CD
0/r (with nosei sakata/*0) [12k, usa] CD



--Boundary_(ID_cd8nSikZgDIp9vcq5FrBzQ)
Content-Type: message/rfc822; Name="failure redux"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit