[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] mics >192khz
- To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [microsound] mics >192khz
- From: flemming lyst <flemminglyst@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:23:47 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=8UtBU8w/vop5xEiHhwxXLYswd8XykDDDX5vR708Rmeo=; b=pBxStB8dlGqtNTiytvY33EatwRZeqhkDq+JOLUKKoD5wt2QncAbdedwmze4lpKNvMm Pc8cheBlCAQYN2lsQNtVokgTtHlwHIM6au+SPJ+14TA50adJ77jMTNQNrlSZQRv503x/ CX4LP8CiVYPC+MAil+hbW6Rigwvjqt3B+x22s=
linking threds...:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnQMHl8P5jA
the scientists of tomorrow maybe has one???
much music has been made without being heard, so why not make music for the
people(or yourself) in the future???
maybe a project??
---------------------------------------------
rules:
1. all sound must be over 20khz.
---------------------------------------------
cheers,
eske
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:52 AM, barry threw <bthrew@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But where will you buy a new ear?
>
> bt
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2008, at 1:25 PM, flemming lyst wrote:
>
> oh, im very well aware of the concepts. i'm just having a hard time
>> finding
>> the gear...
>> but i'll test my mics and see where they cut off...
>> thanks anyway...
>>
>>
>> -eske
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Bruce Tovsky <bruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >wrote:
>>
>> mics, being analog devices, don't really have a "ceiling" per se
>>> regarding
>>> sample rate - what they do have is a frequency range, and the higher
>>> sample
>>> rates provide a greater ability to capture those frequencies. so, the
>>> better
>>> the mic the better your recording (using any sample rate) and the better
>>> the
>>> sample rate the better (subjectively) the recording - or, i should say,
>>> the
>>> better the capture of the frequencies the mic is delivering.
>>> make sense?
>>> best
>>> b
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 11, 2008, at 3:00 PM, flemming lyst wrote:
>>>
>>> anyone got any tips on a mic that will record all the way up to 96khz?
>>>
>>>> as i'm able to record 192khz with my fireface i'm interested to hear
>>>> what's
>>>> going on up there...?
>>>>
>>>> any suggestions??
>>>>
>>>> i found some b&K on their website, but no prices...
>>>> www.bksv.com
>>>>
>>>> btw check out this fine article:
>>>> http://emusician.com/daw/emusic_going_wild/index.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> eske
>>>>
>>>>
>>> "A lot of people try to think up ideas. I'm not one. I'd rather accept
>>> the
>>> irresistible possibilities of what I can't ignore."
>>>
>>> - Robert Rauschenberg
>>>
>>>
>>>
> barry threw
> Media Art and Technology
>
> San Francisco, CA
> Work: 857-544-3967
> Email: bthrew (at) gmail (dot) com
> Web: www.barrythrew.com
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>
>