Re: [microsound] stockhausen RIP

[aleks vasic <bvasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You can attach whatever you want to some one else's comments but in  
the end your assumption is what is truly irrelevant because it is just  
that, an assumtpion.

I honestly meant no disrespect, but if fanboys cannot separate their  
emotions from hard cold facts  then a meaningful conversation is a  
moot point.

Cheers

Aleks

On Dec 8, 2007, at 6:55 PM, "emanuele de raymondi"  
<ederaymo2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes, he was controversial and yes he had a big ego
> (but isn't it the history of western music, for the most part,
> a long list of ego-maniac personalities?). The "brilliant mind" factor
> I also find rather irrelevant. To those "brilliant mind" comments
> you could easily attach an unspoken: "horrible man, awful musician,
> but a brilliant mind indeed!".
> Ultimately, in my opinion, what counts is the music the man left  
> behind,
> and his music is almost always powerful, deep, original and full of  
> beauty.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2007 11:22 AM, peter price <pprice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > a more meaningful obit than most:
> >
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/08/arts/music/08stockhausen-1.html
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > website: http://www.microsound.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org