[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] Max/Msp 5 is here
- To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [microsound] Max/Msp 5 is here
- From: Matt Tierney <matthewdtierney@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:05:30 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=hjOjgm9dHSuBMvStVJpfI1Y+3/kNmruX1CV18TMbGU4=; b=FOPzvEAfg53mAyZsywqRZ1jvMfka8/cgZXnbEq6UFIghAMReZpDC87DLuuiEHJBGsGUhzTteKzHHa1Udb+kRXSnPfII2ngwj1CNVm6wNEQCuDa5Uw7MdjCDVkEqy36HH2cM8RT5tsIDDwZrOTIbX/lQWCZIYsfF8m9ig9deHEvk=
Though, I am sure many members of this list are simply electronic purists,
possibly employing only digital techniques with never a sampled acoustic
sound or a physical recording in sight.
Hehe, in *earshot*, i should say...
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Frank Barknecht <fbar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hallo,
> craquemat hat gesagt: // craquemat wrote:
>
> > Please, expound.
>
> E.g. field recordings may be the antonym of the microparticle-based
> cut-up stuff Roads is into.
>
> (Being a non-academic and non-native speaker I had to look up both
> "expound" and "antonym" ;)
>
> > Paulo Mouat wrote:
> > >In the academia sense and heritage he probably is. There is a
> > >disconnect in the notion of microsound as expounded by Roads (and by
> > >extension, accepted in academic circles) and that typically discussed
> > >on this list.
>
> Ciao
> --
> Frank
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>
>
--
http://artmentaldisorder.blogspot.com